The Biophysical Efficacy of Smart Phones on the Eyes of Children from 3-12 Years

Authors

  • Munther Sameen Shuker1, Zina Tariq Ali2

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12118

Keywords:

biophysical efficacy; smart phones; eyes of children.

Abstract

The modern day electronic gadget like laptops, smart phones (which offers advanced Technologies’ with
functionality similar as a personal computer), TV, computer games that held by hand, … etc. that completely
influence the vision, a books or a newspaper that read is healthier than reading taken away the electronic
devices due to the printing materials are typically great in divergence while the electronic screen contentment
approach with drop contrast and thus needs further optical focus as well as added strain to the eye. In the
current study , we assess the biophysical effectiveness of mobile phone on children up to 12 years, the
current study was enrolled fifty (50) children, the information were taken as (age, gender, time of using
mobile phone in hours, at which time the child use mobile phone day or night, visual acuity, family history,
symptoms). Many optical devices used to obtain precise measurements from the patients which included
(Snellen chart, autorefractometer, retinoscope, trial case, E card test, finger cube test, hand card test, catford
drum test, Sheridan gardiner test and prism bar).
After conducting the necessary statistical methods and tests, it revealed that the most factor has more effect
is the number of hours of using mobile phone devices and the children between (6-8) years were the most
used mobile phone devices.

Author Biography

  • Munther Sameen Shuker1, Zina Tariq Ali2

    1
    Assistant prof./ College of Health & Medical Technology -Baghdad Middle Technical University (MTU);
    2Lecturer College of Health & Medical Technology -Baghdad, Middle Technical University (MTU)

Downloads

Published

2020-10-29

How to Cite

The Biophysical Efficacy of Smart Phones on the Eyes of Children from 3-12 Years. (2020). Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 14(4), 3194-3200. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12118