Evaluation of Marginal adaptation at Interfaces Using Composite Resin to Different Setting Amalgam Filling in Class II Cavity Preparation

Authors

  • Mohammed Kassim Gholam 1 , Biland MS Shukri 2 , Haider Hasan Jasim 3

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13787

Keywords:

microleakage, marginal adaptation, Class II cavity, amalgam-composite restoration.

Abstract

Aim: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the microleakage of composite restorations alone or
with amalgam base in proximal box of class ? cavity preparation.
Methode: Eighty proximal cavities (Mesio-occlusal and disto-occlusal) were prepared in 40 premolars
with carbide bur and randomly divided into four groups. Group A restored with composite resin; the other
three groups restored with combined amalgam-composite restoration as follows. Group B the composite
inserted immediately after insertion of amalgam, group C the composite inserted after 5 minutes of amalgam
insertion while in group D the composite inserted after two days of amalgam insertion. Marginal adaptation
was evaluated at the following interfaces: tooth-amalgam(T-A), tooth-composite resin (T-C) and amalgamcomposite (A-C). Microleakage was evaluated by means of methylene blue infiltration after 21 days water
storage and thermocycling aging. Microleakage was assessed by measuring the depth of horizontal dye
penetration. Image J analysis software was used to measure the penetration of dye in the tooth- filling
interface and in the amalgam- composite interface. One-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey HSD tests (?
=0.05) were used statistically for analyzing gather data.
Results: There were a significant statically showed by ANOVA test between teeth -fillings interface,
according to Tukey’s test there were a significant difference between teeth-composite interface and teethamalgam interface (p<0.05), while between composite- amalgam interface, ANOVA test showed a significant
difference between groups and Tukey’s test showed a significant difference between groups according to
time of placement of composite on amalgam filling (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Using of amalgam at the cervical base of the box in Class II combined amalgam-composite
restoration has better result than using of composite from marginal leakage view.

Author Biography

Mohammed Kassim Gholam 1 , Biland MS Shukri 2 , Haider Hasan Jasim 3

1
B.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. Ass.Professor of Mustansiriyah Dentistry Department of Conservative Dentistry.
2B.D.S., M.Sc. Ass.Professor of Mustansiriyah Dentistry Department of Conservative Dentistry,
3B.D.S., M.Sc. Ass.Professor of Mustansiriyah Dentistry Department of Conservative Dentistry

Downloads

Published

2020-12-31

How to Cite

Mohammed Kassim Gholam 1 , Biland MS Shukri 2 , Haider Hasan Jasim 3. (2020). Evaluation of Marginal adaptation at Interfaces Using Composite Resin to Different Setting Amalgam Filling in Class II Cavity Preparation. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 15(1), 2575–2580. https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13787