The Epistemological Aspects of Investigative Hypotheses
Keywords:investigation, hypothesis, truth, cognition
This paper is about the philosophical and epistemological aspects of investigative hypotheses.
Criminal investigation is a kind of cognition, so it is important to know the basic philosophic concept
of knowledge and truth. Different schools and traditions of philosophy have given different answers to
One of the basic elements of investigative thinking is, in addition to being reconstructive and
retrospective, thinking in hypotheses. Logical, semantic, syntactic, epistemological, and ontological
principles must be taken into account when formulating hypotheses. Choosing between the hypotheses
should be based on preference and indifference criteria. These criteria of preference and indifference
will also be logical and epistemological.
Testing, validating, and rejecting hypotheses is an essential element of investigative work. The
plausibility, credibility, and accuracy of competing hypotheses are constantly changing depending
on the investigative data obtained. It is a basic principle that all hypotheses should be tested and, if
possible, the testing should be performed in parallel.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Re use and mixing of content policy- We follow Creative Commons Licence Policy. We follow CC BY. Please refer below for all details
This license lets others distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon our work, even commercially, as long as they credit us for the original creation.
- The journal allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of its articles and allow readers to use them for any other lawful purpose.
- The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions.
- The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions