Gender Differences On Data Of Palm Sweat Pores In Myanmar And Cambodian Nationality.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/hxejzd32Keywords:
Pore, Gender differences, Myanmar, CambodianAbstract
The sweat pore is helpful in terms of identification like minutiae. This research aims to study the differences in the number of sweat pores, types of sweat pores, and the size of sweat pores in male and female volunteers of Myanmar and Cambodian nationality. The researcher has studied the differences in sweat pores data to explore differences between the genders. This research consists of 100 volunteers aged 20-60 years. The results found no significant differences between the genders of the two nationalities. This research revealed that men had more sweat pores than females. In Myanmar nationality, males have an average number of sweat pores at 112.8±1.6, while females have 110.6±0.9 sweat pores. In Cambodian nationality, males found an average number of 131.2±0.8 sweat pores and 130.72±1.9 in females. Studies on the types of sweat pores have found them to be more closed than open sweat pores. Except for female volunteers of Myanmar nationality, more open sweat pores were found than closed sweat pores. Besides, the size of sweat pores in Myanmar was small in both genders, followed by medium and large. Meanwhile, the Cambodian found similar findings in male volunteers. The exception was female volunteers with the same small and medium-sized sweat pores and found the least large sweat pores. Studying data on sweat pores on the palms of different nationalities is very important in forensic science.
References
Ashbaugh DR. Quantitative-Qualitative Friction Ridge Analysis: An introduction to Basic and Advanced Ridgeology. New York: CRC Press; 1999.
Maltoni D, Maio, D., Jain, AK, PrabhakarS. Handbook of FingerprintRecognition. 2nd Edition. USA: Springer-Verlag;2009.
Champod C, Lennard C, Margot P, Stoilovic M. Fingerprints and Other Ridge Skin Impressions. New York: CRC Press; 2004.
Office of Police Forensic Science. Practice Guide of Verification in Fingerprint, Palm and Sole. Bangkok: Policeprinting. (In Thai); 2016.
Dara P, Mandya DN, Basappa M, Bheemasamudra MB. Study of Poroscopy Among South Indian Population. Journal of Forensic Sciences 2012; 57(2): 449-452.
Bhagwat V, Kumar DM, Lakshmi NV. Poroscopy – The Study of Sweat Pores among Central Indian Population. Scholars International Journal of Anatomy and Physiolog 2020; 3(6): 53-56.
JainAK, ChenY, Demirkus M. Pores and Ridges: High-Resolution Fingerprint Matching Using Level 3 Features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2007; 29(1): 15-27.
Tafazoli M, Shahri NM, Ejtehadi H, Haddad, F, Nooghabi HJ, Shahri MM, Naderi S. Biological Variability of Sweat Gland Pores in the Fingerprints of a Fars Iranian Family from Khorasan Razavi Province, Iran. Anatomical Sciences Journal 2013; 10(2): 99-104.
Bindra B, Jasuja OP, Singla AK. Poroscopy: A method of personal identification revisited. Anil Aggrawal’s Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology 2000; 1(1): 1-4.
Nagesh KR, Bathwal S, Ashoka B. A preliminary study of pores on epidermal ridges: Are there any sex differences and age related changes?. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2011; 18: 302-305.
Wijerathne BTB. (2015). Poroscopy: an important research field in Medicine and Physical Anthropology. Anuradhapura Medical Journal 2015; 9(2): 44-46.
Acree MA. Is there a difference in fingerprint ridge density?. Forensic Sci Int 1999; 102: 35-44.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rungrat Urapen, Woratouch Witchuvanit
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/deed.en