Evaluating 7.5 M Ammonium Acetate for the Extraction of DNA from Degraded Saliva Samples: A Comprehensive Forensic Evaluation

Authors

  • Ashble Vailankanni Fernandes Masters in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom
  • Sasitaran Iyavoo Senior Lecturer in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/ppdz8081

Keywords:

Forensic DNA extraction, saliva evidence, degraded DNA, ammonium acetate precipitation, STR profiling

Abstract

Recovering DNA from environmentally degraded biological samples remains one of the most persistent challenges in forensic science. Saliva, though highly valuable as a source of epithelial cells, is frequently exposed to detrimental environmental factors that accelerate chemical, enzymatic, and structural DNA degradation. This study thoroughly investigates the effectiveness of a 7.5 M ammonium acetate-based extraction protocol for the recovery of usable DNA from saliva subjected to controlled UV radiation, thermal degradation, and sodium hypochlorite exposure. DNA yield and purity were assessed using NanoDrop spectrophotometry, and STR profiling was performed using the VeriFiler™ Express PCR Amplification Kit. Results demonstrated that although degradation significantly impacted nucleic acid concentration and purity, amplifiable DNA was recovered, producing partial to near-complete STR profiles. These findings indicate that ammonium acetate precipitation is a cost-effective, non-toxic alternative for resource-limited laboratories, with important implications for forensic casework involving compromised biological evidence.

Author Biographies

  • Ashble Vailankanni Fernandes, Masters in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

    Masters in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

  • Sasitaran Iyavoo, Senior Lecturer in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

    Senior Lecturer in Forensic Science, University of Lincoln, United Kingdom

References

Jamieson A, Bader S. A guide to forensic DNA profiling. John Wiley & Sons; 2016.

Habibi P, Ostad SN, Heydari A, Aliebrahimi S, Montazeri V, Foroushani AR, et al. Effect of heat stress on DNA damage: a systematic literature review. Int J Biometeorol. 2022;66(11):2147–58.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00484-022-02351-w

Khorwal D, Mathur GK, Ahmed U, Daga SS. Environmental factors affecting the concentration of DNA in blood and saliva stains: A review. J Forens Sci Res. 2024;8(1):009–15.

http://dx.doi.org/10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001057

Mcclintock JT. Forensic DNA analysis: A Laboratory Manual. CRC Press; 2008.

Upadhyay M, Shrivastava P, Verma K, Joshi B. Recent advancements in identification and detection of saliva as forensic evidence: a review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2023;13(1).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00336-3

Butler JM. Fundamentals of Forensic DNA typing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2010.

Liu AW, Villar-Briones A, Luscombe NM, Plessy C. Automated phenol-chloroform extraction of high molecular weight genomic DNA for use in long-read single-molecule sequencing. F1000Res. 2022;11:240.

http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109251.1

Phillips K, McCallum N, Welch L. A comparison of methods for forensic DNA extraction: Chelex-100® and the QIAGEN DNA Investigator Kit (manual and automated). Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012;6(2):282–5.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.04.018

Muturi SM, Karanja, LS, Wachira FN, Wambulwa MC. Ten (10) M ammonium acetate is an efficient molecular concentration for the extraction of genomic DNA from small insects used for rolling circle amplification. African J Biotech. 2013; 12(39): 5790-5798.

https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2013.12848

Vajagathali M, Sudhan M, Vignesh S, Jayashree TS, Moorthi A. Standardized protocol for the isolation of DNA from human saliva- a pilot study. In International Research Journal of Biological Sciences. 2021;10(3):40–4.

Perry J, Munshi T, Haizel T, Iyavoo S. Validation of reduced volume VeriFilerTM Express PCR Amplification Kit for buccal swab samples extracted using Prep-n-GoTM Buffer. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67(5):1971–8.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15084

Rastogi RP, Richa, Kumar A, Tyagi MB, Sinha RP. Molecular mechanisms of ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage and repair. J Nucleic Acids. 2010;2010(1):592980.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2010/592980

Jin S-G, Padron F, Pfeifer GP. UVA radiation, DNA damage, and melanoma. ACS Omega. 2022;7(37):32936–48.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c04424

Żarczyńska M, Żarczyński P, Tomsia M. Nucleic acids persistence-benefits and limitations in forensic genetics. Genes (Basel). 2023;14(8):1643.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes14081643

Oei AL, Vriend LEM, Crezee J, Franken NAP, Krawczyk PM. Effects of hyperthermia on DNA repair pathways: one treatment to inhibit them all. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10(1):165.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0462-0

Nakagawa Y, Kajihara A, Kirita T, Mori E. Heat meets DNA: DNA damage and repair. Therm Med. 2018;34(2):15–22.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3191/thermalmed.34.15

Tuccinardi A. Investigating the Efficacy of DNA Damage with Bleach in Forensic Laboratories and at Crime Scenes. In: Digital Commons @ New Haven. 2020.

Cashins SD, Skerratt LF, Alford RA. Sodium hypochlorite denatures the DNA of the amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Dis Aquat Organ. 2008;80(1):63–7.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/dao01919

Majumdar S, Chatterjee A. Ammonium acetate induced isolation of plasmid DNA. 2014.

Singh UA, Kumari M, Iyengar S. Method for improving the quality of genomic DNA obtained from minute quantities of tissue and blood samples using Chelex 100 resin. Biol Proced Online. 2018;20:12.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12575-018-0077-6

Bruijns B, Hoekema T, Oomens L, Tiggelaar R, Gardeniers H. Performance of spectrophotometric and fluorometric DNA quantification methods. Analytica (Basel). 2022;3(3):371–84.

http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/analytica3030025

Mccord B, Opel K, Maribel F, Zoopis S, Jantz LM. An Investigation of the Effect of DNA Degradation and Inhibition on PCR Amplification of Single Source and Mixed Forensic Samples. 2011.

Mautner ME, Pérez Santángelo A, Corti Bielsa RM, Sala A, Ginart S, Corach D. Using long ssDNA polynucleotides to amplify STRs loci in degraded DNA samples. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187190.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187190

Butler JM. Advanced topics in forensic DNA typing: Interpretation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2015.

García-Alegría AM, Anduro-Corona I, Pérez-Martínez CJ, Guadalupe Corella-Madueño MA, Rascón-Durán ML, Astiazaran-Garcia H. Quantification of DNA through the NanoDrop spectrophotometer: Methodological validation using standard reference material and Sprague Dawley rat and human DNA. Int J Anal Chem. 2020;2020:8896738.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8896738

Rivero ERC, Neves AC, Silva-Valenzuela MG, Sousa SOM, Nunes FD. Simple salting-out method for DNA extraction from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Pathol Res Pract. 2006;202(7):523–9.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prp.2006.02.007

Bukyya JL, Tejasvi MLA, Avinash A, P CH, Talwade P, Afroz MM, et al. DNA profiling in forensic science: A review. Glob Med Genet. 2021;8(4):135–43.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1728689

Garbieri TF, Brozoski DT, Dionísio TJ, Santos CF, Neves LT das. Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017;25(2):147–58.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-77572016-0046

Downloads

Published

2026-04-23

How to Cite

Evaluating 7.5 M Ammonium Acetate for the Extraction of DNA from Degraded Saliva Samples: A Comprehensive Forensic Evaluation. (2026). Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 20(2), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.37506/ppdz8081