Comparison of Thoracic Analgesia with Epidural Fentanyl and Transdermal Fentanyl Patch: A Comparitive Prospective Randomized Study

Authors

  • Ayushi Vashisht
  • Kumar Parag
  • Robina Makker
  • Nishith Govil
  • Arvind Makker

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/tp26af26

Keywords:

fentayl, analgesia, pain, chest wall

Abstract

 Background: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is used for analgesia following lower abdomen or orthopaedic 
surgeries. The aim of study was To compare the effects of 0.125% Bupivacaine with 2mcg/ml of Fentanyl infusion 
(group A) and 0.125% Bupivacaine with fentanyl patch (group B).
 Methods: Patients undergoing elective surgery were randomized in a non-blinded fashion to receive postoperative 
analgesia at a single teaching hospital. A nested qualitative study (reported elsewhere) explored the dual primary 
outcome of patient experience and acceptability. Secondary outcome measures included rest and movement pain 
scores over 72 h, functional analgesia, analgesia satisfaction, opiate consumption, functional recovery, morbidity, 
safety, and cost-effectiveness.
 Results: A total of 40 patients were randomized. The median (interquartile range; i.q.r.) dynamic pain score at 24 h 
was significantly lower after TEA than RSCA (33 (11–60) versus 50.5 (24.50–77.25); P = 0.018). Resting pain score at 
72 h was significantly lower (4.5 (0.25–13.75) versus 12.5 (2–13); P = 0.019). Opiate consumption on postoperative 
day 3 (median (i.q.r.) morphine equivalent 17 (10–30) mg versus 40 (13.25–88.50) mg; P = 0.038), hypotension, or 
vasopressor dependency (29.7 versus 49.2 per cent; P = 0.023) and weight gain to day 3 (median (i.q.r.) 0 (−1–2) kg 
versus 1 (0–3) kg; P = 0.046) were all significantly greater after TEA.
 Conclusions: TEA provided superior initial postoperative analgesia but only for the first 24 h. By 72 hours and 
provides superior analgesia, is associated with a lower incidence of unwanted effects, and may be more cost
effective.

Author Biographies

  • Ayushi Vashisht

    Resident, Department Of Anaesthesia, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Medical And Health Sciences, 
    Patel Nagar, Dehradun

  • Kumar Parag

    Professor, Department Of Anaesthesia, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Medical 
    And Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun

  • Robina Makker

    Professor And Hod, Department Of Anaesthesia, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Medical And Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun

  • Nishith Govil

    Professor, Department Of Anaesthesia, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Medical And Health Sciences, Patel Nagar, Dehradun, 

  • Arvind Makker

    Professor And Hod, Department Of CTVS, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute Of Medical And Health Sciences, 
    Patel Nagar, Dehradun

References

Ochroch EA, Gottschalk A, Augostides J, Carson

KA, Kent L, Malayamen N et al. Long-term pain and

activity during recovery from major thoracotomy

using thoracic epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology

;97:1234-44.

Bauer C, Hentz JG, Ducrocq X, Nicolas M, Oswald

Mammosser M, Steick A et al. Lung function after

lobectomy: a randomized, doubleblinded trial

comparing thoracic epidural ropivacaine/sufentanil

and intravenous morphine for patient- controlled

analgesia. Anesth Analg 2007;105:238-44.

Guay J. The benefit of adding epidural analgesia to

general anesthesia: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth

;20:290-9.

Senturk M. Acute and chronic pain after

thoracothomies. Curr Opin Anesth 2005;18:1-4.

Goto T. What is the best pain control after thoracic

surgery? J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(3):1335-1338.

Soto RG, Fu SM. Acute pain management for

patients undergoing thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg.

;75:1349–57

Novak-Jankovic V, Potocnik I. Perioperative analgesia

for thoracic surgery. Period Biol. 2005;117(1):5–9

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Comparison of Thoracic Analgesia with Epidural Fentanyl and Transdermal Fentanyl Patch: A Comparitive Prospective Randomized Study. (2024). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 15(2), 25-29. https://doi.org/10.37506/tp26af26