Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Profile between Men and Women with Coronary Artery Disease

Authors

  • Soumya Ranjan Mahapatra
  • Sandeep Bansal
  • Preeti Gupta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/5d1azz12

Keywords:

Coronary Artery Disease, Women, Risk Factors.

Abstract

Aim of the Study: To study the clinical and angiographic profile of coronary artery disease (CAD) among women & men to compare the difference in these profiles CAD.
Materials and Methods: 1000 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) for coronary artery disease were taken for this study. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of gender. The risk factors, clinical presentation, echo cardiographic features, angiographic profile and treatment modalities were analyzed and compared between both groups.
Results: 300 patients were female and 700 patients were male with a mean age group of 57.2 years & 53.2 years respectively. On comparing the angiographic data CAD was higher among men. Significantly men received
greater thrombolytic therapy than women & any intervention in form of PCI/CABG at admission or within 3
months of follow up was significantly greater in men than in women.
Conclusion: There has been a shift with respect to onset of risk factors and clinical presentation for coronary artery disease in the women. It is necessary to identify atherosclerotic risk factors in women and treat them appropriately to prevent further cardiovascular events. Interventional options PCI & CABG are done more often in men as compared to women.

Author Biographies

  • Soumya Ranjan Mahapatra

    Associate Professor, Department of Cardiology, IMS & SUM Hospital, Siksha O Anusandhan (Deemed
    to be) University, India

  • Sandeep Bansal

    Professor, Department of Cardiology, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India

  • Preeti Gupta

    Assistant Professor, Department of Cardiology, VMMC &Safdarjung Hospital, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, India.

References

Wang Shu, Wang Lei, Song Peng. Recent development

of ischaemic heart disease in sex difference. Postgrad

Med J2007;83:240–243. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.053140

Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al: Effect of potentially

modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial

infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study):

Case-control study. Lancet 2004; 364:937

Parloop Bhatt, Parth Parikh,Aditi Patel, Roosha

Parikh, Apurva Patel, Jawahar L. Mehta. Keyur Parikh.

Unique Aspects of Coronary Artery Disease in Indian

Women. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther (2015) 29:369–376.

Gupta R, Sharma KK, Gupta A, Agrawal A, Mohan

I, Gupta VP, et al. Persistent [14] high prevalence of

cardiovascular risk factors in the urban middle class in

India: Jaipur Heart Watch-5. J Assoc Physicians India.

; 60:11-6.

Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML,

Chaitman BR, White HD, et al. Third Universal

Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation. 2012

Oct 16; 126(16):2020–35.

Supriya Bajaj, Vijay Mahajan, Sumit Grover, Amit

Mahajan, Nipun Mahajan. Gender Based Differences

in Risk Factor Profile and Coronary Angiography of

Patients Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction

in North Indian Population. Journal of Clinical and

Diagnostic Research. 2016 May, Vol-10(5): OC05-OC07.

Butala NM, Desai MM, Linnander EL, Wong YR,

Mikhail DG, Ott LS, et al. Gender [19] Differences in

Presentation, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes

for Patients with AMI in a Lower-Middle Income

Country: Evidence from Egypt. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6(10):

e25904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025904.

Anand K, Shah B, Yadav K, Singh R, Mathur P, Paul

E, et al [15]. Are the urban poor vulnerable to noncommunicable

diseass? A survey of risk factors

for noncommunicable diseases in urban slums of

Faridabad. Natl Med J India. 2007; 20:115-20.

Sekhri T, Kanwar RS, Wilfred R, et al. Prevalence of risk

factors for coronary artery disease in an urban Indian

population. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005346.doi:10.1136/

bmjopen-2014005346

Alfredsson, J. and Swahn, E. (2010), Management of

acute coronary syndromes from a gender perspective.

Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 24: 719–728

Hemingway H, Langenberg C, Damant J, Frost C,

Pyorala K, Barrett-Connor E. Prevalence of angina in

women versus men: a systematic review and metaanalysis

of international variations across 31 countries.

Circulation. 2008 Mar 25;117(12):1526–1536.

Chokkalingam M, Avinash Jayachandran., Pradeep

G Nayar, Arumugam C, Ganesh N. Clinical Profile

of Young Women with CAD. Chettinad Health City

Medical Journal 2015; 4(2): 75 – 77.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Comparison of Clinical and Angiographic Profile between Men and Women with Coronary Artery Disease. (2024). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 15(2), 281-286. https://doi.org/10.37506/5d1azz12