An Observational Study on Port-site Infection and its Management in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/swn10t56Keywords:
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, port-site infection (PSI), biliary spillage, open port creation.Abstract
Background: With increasing number of performed laparoscopic cholecystectomies, there is an increasing number ,of port site infection, although it occurs infrequently, but it has significant influence on overall outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aims of the present study was to identify the causative organism involved in port-site infection (PSI) and its management and outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy objectives and to evaluate causative organism involved in port site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Materials & Methods: Patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and now presenting with PSI
in General Surgery OPD and Emergency of Burdwan Medical College and Hospital. Thorough clinical history
taking followed by swabs was taken for culture and sensitivity in all patients who developed port site infection after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Tissue samples were taken for detection of mycobacterium tuberculosis by CBNAAT. All patients were followed up for 6 months post operatively. Incidence of PSI in relation to gender, pre-operative diagnosis, spillage, relation with different port sites and the type of microorganism associated was evaluated and compared with previous study.
Results: In the present study 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 19 patients reported port site infection after surgery, whereas the remaining 71 patients had uneventful post operative period. Out of the 19 infected 7 were male [25% of total male cases] and 12 were female [19% of total female cases]. Cases of port site infection were 21% of total cases. Conclusion: The incidence of PSI was higher in cases of acutely inflamed GB, biliary spillage, open port creation, avoidance of endo-bag, and in comorbidities. They were managed with either antibiotics, dressing or surgical exploration.
References
Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown RS. A
population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic
cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J
Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 334-340.
Dubois F, Icard P, Berthelot G, Levard H. Coelioscopic
cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases. Ann
Surg. 1990 Jan;211(1):60-2.
Mehraj A, Naqvi MA, Feroz SH, ur Rasheed H.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an audit of 500
patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2011 Oct-
Dec;23(4):88-90.
Williams LF Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC
Jr, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK. Comparison of laparoscopic
cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a
single center. Am J Surg. 1993 Apr;165(4):459-65.
Pham, Thai H & John G Hunter. Ch 32: Gallbladder
and extrahepatic biliary system. Andersen, Dana K., et
al., eds. Schwartz’s Principles of Surgery. 10th ed. MC
Graw Hill Education, 2015, P 1324.
Shindholimath VV, Seenu V, Parshad R, Chaudhry
R, Kumar A. Factors influencing wound infection
following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Trop
Gastroenterol. 2003 Apr-Jun;24(2):90-2.
Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP.
Nosocomial infections in combined medical-surgical
intensive care units in the United States. Infect Control
Hosp Epidemiol. 2000 Aug;21(8):510-5.
Jan WA, Ali IS, Shah NA, Ghani A, Khan M, Khan AS.
The frequency of port-site infection in laparoscopic
cholecystectomies. JPMI. 2008; 22(1): 66-70.
den Hoed PT, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, Hop WC,
Bruining HA. Infections and bacteriological data after
laparoscopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp
Infect. 1998 May;39(1):27-37.
Saud JD, Al-Hail MCA. Surgical site infection after
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Basrah Journal of
Surgery 2010;16: 119-121.
Al-Naser MKH. Port Site Infections after laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. International Journal of Medical
Research & Health Sciences 2017; 6(6): 132-137.
Alam MR, Nuruzzaman M, Begum M, et al. The
frequency of port-site infection in laparoscopic
cholecystectomies. Med Today 2021, 25:22-6.
Nawaz T, Ayub MW, Umair A, Khan A, Ali
Q, Murad F, et al. Comparison between veress
needle (closed) technique and open technique in
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jr Rawal Med Col. 2016
;20(2) [Available at https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/317239639] [Accessed on May 13, 2023]
Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Pai MV.
Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications:
A descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg. 2013
Apr;9(2):59-64.
Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego
Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA. Risks of the
minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery:
multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical
trocar insertion. World J Surg. 1997 Jun;21(5):529-33.
Sherwani AF, Ahmed HV, Aziz R, et al. Use of
Retrieval Bag Using Drain Bag vs Direct Extraction
of Gall Bladder Specimen After Laparoscopic
Cholecystectomy: Our Experience With 600 Patients.
New Indian J Surg. 2020;11(2):93–98.
Akhtar N, Kiyani Z, Ahmed N, Sabir F, Imran M,
Gillani I. Comparison of port site wound infection
with and without endobags techniques for retrieval of
gall bladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PJP
[Internet]. 31Mar.2022 [cited 15Sep.2022];18(1):23-5.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.