Evaluation between Serum Level CRP and Maternal Outcomes that includes Preterm Delivery: A Prospective Analysis

Authors

  • Ruchi Gupta
  • Sushil Kumar
  • Uday Pratap

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/w2jaqc54

Keywords:

C-reactive protein, Gestational age, pregnancy, Preterm.

Abstract

Background and Aim: C-reactive protein is commonly employed as a biomarker to track the development of
inflammatory and infectious disorders. There aren’t many researches that have investigated the link between maternal serum CRP concentrations early in pregnancy and preterm birth or neonatal outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between serum level CRP and maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes including preterm delivery and Small for gestational age (SGA).
Material and Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 400 pregnant women who delivered at the
Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of a medical college and affiliated hospital for the period of one year.
Pregnant women who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled after giving their informed consent, and the serum C-reactive protein levels were measured at the gestational age (GA) of 14 to 20 weeks. Pregnant women were then followed up to delivery, and based on the GA at delivery, they were divided into preterm and non-preterm groups. A reference level of 1.5 mg/dl is used. Therefore, pregnancies with high maternal serum C - reactive protein were those in which the maternal serum level was above 1.5 mg/dl.
Results: A total of 296 individuals in group A and 104 individuals in group B had CRP levels below 1.5 mg/dl,
respectively. This study’s average gestational age was 18.8 weeks. The minimum and maximum gestational ages were 12+1 and 21+3 weeks, respectively. In this study, 316 individuals delivered at term, while 84 people delivered preterm. In the population under study, 114 individuals underwent LSCS, while the remaining 286 women gave birth vaginally. 400 patients in total were included in the study; 316 had CRP levels under 1.5; of these, 272 had term deliveries, while 24 had preterm births. The remaining 84 individuals had a CRP of greater than 1.5; of these, 60 had preterm deliveries and 24 had term births.
Conclusion: Assessment of maternal concentrations of CRP can be used as suitable biomarker for predicting
preterm labor, and also despite the limitation in the number of patients, response to tocolytic therapy in our study was predictable by the evaluation concentrations of CRP of these women.

Author Biographies

  • Ruchi Gupta

    Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gyanecology, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur,
    Rajasthan

  • Sushil Kumar

    Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Rani durgawati Medical College Banda
    Tinwara, Uttar Pradesh

  • Uday Pratap

    Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Geetanjali Medical College, Udaipur, Rajasthan

References

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Understanding

Premature Birth and Assuring Healthy Outcomes.

Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention.

Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors. Washington (DC):

National Academies Press (US); 2007.

Stritzke A, Thomas S, Amin H, Fusch C, Lodha A.

Renal consequences of preterm birth. Mol Cell Pediatr.

Dec;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40348-016-0068-0. Epub

Jan 18. PMID: 28101838; PMCID: PMC5243236.

Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero

R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth.

Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/

S0140-6736(08)60074-4. PMID: 18177778; PMCID:

PMC7134569.

Moutquin JM. Classification and heterogeneity of

preterm birth. BJOG. 2003 Apr;110 Suppl 20:30-3. doi:

1016/s1470-0328(03)00021-1. PMID: 12763108.

TC, Okeke, et al. “The Incidence and Management

Outcome of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes

(PPROM) in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.” American

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research 2.1 (2014): 14-17.

Patel S, Metgud R. Estimation of salivary lactate

dehydrogenase in oral leukoplakia and oral squamous

cell carcinoma: a biochemical study. J Cancer Res Ther.

Jan-Mar;11(1):119-23.

Keelan JA, Newnham JP. Recent advances in the

prevention of preterm birth. F1000Res. 2017 Jul

;6:F1000 Faculty Rev-1139.

Romero R, Espinoza J, Gonçalves LF, Kusanovic

JP, Friel L, Hassan S. The role of inflammation and

infection in preterm birth. Semin Reprod Med. 2007

Jan;25(1):21-39.

Chatterjee J, Gullam J, Vatish M, Thornton S. The

management of preterm labour. Arch Dis Child Fetal

Neonatal Ed. 2007 Mar;92(2):F88-93.

Stock SJ, Horne M, Bruijn M, White H, Boyd KA,

Heggie R, Wotherspoon L, Aucott L, Morris RK,

Dorling J, Jackson L, Chandiramani M, David AL,

Khalil A, Shennan A, van Baaren GJ, Hodgetts-Morton

V, Lavender T, Schuit E, Harper-Clarke S, Mol BW,

Riley RD, Norman JE, Norrie J. Development and

validation of a risk prediction model of preterm birth

for women with preterm labour symptoms (the QUIDS

study): A prospective cohort study and individual

participant data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2021 Jul

;18(7):e1003686.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on

Understanding Premature Birth and Assuring

Healthy Outcomes; Behrman RE, Butler AS, editors.

Preterm Birth: Causes, Consequences, and Prevention.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US);

10, Mortality and Acute Complications in

Preterm Infants. Available from: https://www.ncbi.

nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11385/

Barfield WD. Public Health Implications of Very

Preterm Birth. Clin Perinatol. 2018 Sep;45(3):565-577

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Evaluation between Serum Level CRP and Maternal Outcomes that includes Preterm Delivery: A Prospective Analysis. (2024). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 15(2), 303-307. https://doi.org/10.37506/w2jaqc54