Clinical Profile and Outcome of Neonates Admitted in Intensive Care Unit: A Cross Sectional Study in District Hospital

Authors

  • Usha Rani S
  • Ashoka C
  • Soundarya Venkateshan
  • Swetha R
  • Riyaz ahmed

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/af7k6c68

Keywords:

neonatal outcome, neonatal mortality, respiratory distress.

Abstract

Neonatal period, which is the first 28 days of an infant’s life, is the most crucial and vulnerable period. A remarkable decline in mortality rates during neonatal period for the past two decades is due to the advances of obstetric practice in term of medical screening and surveillance and increased neonatal specialization. However, respiratory tract disorders, along with sepsis and other types of infection, are the major causes of neonatal morbidities and mortalities. Hence, this study is aimed to bridge these gaps and provide inputs to the program implementers to design necessary interventions that could contribute to the reduction of neonatal morbidity and mortality.
Aims: To determine the clinical profile and neonatal outcome admitted to NICU in district hospital
Objectives: 1. To determine the socio demographic factors associated with neonatal outcome 2. To determine the obstetric profile associated with neonatal outcome.
Methods: This hospital based retrospective study was conducted in the NICU of Tumakuru district hospital from Jan to March 2023. Records of all the admitted neonates were reviewed. The details were collected based on a structured questionnaire prepared in English. This contained information regarding obstetric and antenatal care (ANC), gestational age at birth, birth weight, sex, APGAR score, age at admission, admission diagnosis, neonatal outcomes and other related details. The data collected was entered in Microsoft excel (MS Excel) and quantitative variables was analysed by mean and qualitative variable by proportion by epi in go 3.4.3. Chi square was used to find out the association between the neonatal outcome and other variables. P value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results: A total of 120 neonates were admitted during the study period. 47 (39.1%) mothers of the neonates were aged 21-25years and followed by 34 (28.3%) mothers in the age of 26-30 years. Association between neonatal outcome and socio demographic components was not statistically significant but definitely outcome was better with the good socio demographic profile. Regarding ANC follow up, 119 (99.1%) mothers had attended at least
one prenatal visit and majority 100 (80%) were having ANC check-up at government hospital. The most common
causes of neonatal mortality were respiratory distress syndrome 4(3.33%), followed by low birth weight 4(3.33%), and preterm 3(2.5%).
Conclusion: Inspite of improved technology and facilities available still the neonatal outcome is worst. These all are preventable causes of neonatal mortality and morbidities which has to be taken care bygiving due importance to its predictors. Maternal and environmental factors has to be taken care and dealt.

Author Biographies

  • Usha Rani S

    Associate Professor, Community medicine, Siddaganga medical College and research Institute, Tumkur,

  • Ashoka C

    Associate Professor, Department of pediatrics, Sri Siddhartha Medical College, Tumkur,

  • Soundarya Venkateshan

    Intern, Department of community medicine, Sri Siddhartha medical college, Tumkur,

  • Swetha R

    Professor and Head,Community Medicine, Siddaganga medical College and research Institute, Tumkur

  • Riyaz ahmed

    Statistician/Assistant professor, Department of community medicine Sri Siddhartha medical college, Tumkur

References

UNICEF. Neonatal Mortality. December 2021.

Available at https://data.unicef.org/topic/childsurvival/

neonatal-mortality/

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/IND/

india/infant-mortality-rate’>India Infant Mortality

Rate 1950-2022. www.macrotrends.net. Retrieved

-08-25

Black RE, Morris SS, Bryce J.Where and why are

million children dying every year? Lancet.

;361(9376):2226-34.

Lawn JE, et al. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? where?

why? The Lancet, 5 March 2005; 365 (9462) : 891-900.

P. Chandini, B. Sunitha Kumari. Clinico- etiological

profile and outcome of neonatal respiratory distress in

tertiary care hospital, Guntur. International Journal of

Contemporary Medical Research 2020;7(1):A16-A19.

Bajad M, Goyal S, Jain B. Clinical profile of neonates

with respiratory distress. Int J Contemp Pediatr

;3:1009-13.

Verma, Jyotsna et al. Neonatal outcome in newborns

admitted in NICU of tertiary care hospital in

central India: a 5-year study. International Journal of

Contemporary Pediatrics, 2018;5(4); 1364-1367.

Al-Momani MM. Admission patterns and risk

factors linked with neonatal mortality: A hospitalbased

retrospective study. Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Sep-

Oct;36(6):1371-1376.

Desalew, A., Sintayehu, Y., Teferi, N. et al. Cause

and predictors of neonatal mortality among neonates

admitted to neonatal intensive care units of public

hospitals in eastern Ethiopia: a facility-based

prospective follow-up study. BMC Pediatr 20, 160

(2020).

Kumar MK, Thakur SN, Singh BB. Study of the

Morbidity and the mortality patterns in the neonatal

intensive care unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital

in Rohtas District, Bihar, India. J Clin Diagn Res.

;6(2):282-5.

Basu S, Rathore P, Bhatia BD. Predictors of mortality

in very low birth weight neonates in India. Singapore

Med J. 2008; 49: 556-60.

Nath Roy R, et al. The mortality pattern of the

hospitalised children in a tertiary care hospital of

Kolkata. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 2008

Jul; 33(3):187-89.

Gebremariam H, Tesfai B, Tewelde S, Abay S,

Tekeste D, Kibreab F. Demographic, Clinical Profile

and Outcomes of Neonates Admitted to Neonatal

Intensive Care Unit of Dekemhare Hospital, Eritrea.

BMC Pediatr. 2022 Dec 15;22(1):716.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Clinical Profile and Outcome of Neonates Admitted in Intensive Care Unit: A Cross Sectional Study in District Hospital. (2024). Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, 15(2), 407-413. https://doi.org/10.37506/af7k6c68