A Mixed Method study on Pattern and Predictors of Plastic Pollution in an Urban block of West Bengal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/wx27wk47Abstract
BACKGROUND- Plastic pollution is one of the gravest environmental concerns of our time, the impact of which have not been studied in detail in our part of the country. Thus an understanding of the distribution and determinants of plastic pollution would be imperative in combating it.
AIM- To quantitatively delineate the Knowledge , Practice , Risk Perception and Intention to carry action among households residing in Urban Field Practice Area of All India Institute of Hygiene & Public Health and map the distribution of Macro Plastic Accumulation and qualitatively comprehend the risk perception and prioritization of action among those causing and mitigating plastic pollution.
Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional, convergent parallel mixed method study was done among 148 Households & 38 participants for in depth interview, of Urban Health Field Practice area of a public health institute of Kolkata. A pretested questionnaire, observational checklist for spot mapping and an in-depth interview guide was used to collect data. Households were evaluated on 3 categories of knowledge, Risk perception and intention to carry action and bivariate correlation was done, in-depth interview of key-informants was done till data saturation. Statistical analyses were done in SPSS 16.0.
RESULTS - Bivariate correlation was done- the knowledge score and perception score showed weakly positive correlation which is not significant. (Correlation co-efficient -0.159, significance at 2 tail – 0.054). The risk perception score and intention to carry action score showed weakly positive correlation which is significant. (Correlation coefficient- 0.254 and significance at two tail 0.002). The knowledge score and Intention to action score showed weakly positive correlation which is significant (correlation coefficient – 0.217 and significance at 2 tail 0.008). In-depth interview of key participants points to the fact that the extremely severe problem of plastic pollution has already reached disastrous potential and fast running out of control. Lack of cheap and versatile packaging product as plastic and government regulations leads to rampant use of plastic products and its improper disposal.
CONCLUSION - Since Knowledge, risk perception and intention to action show positive correlation, Education about plastic pollution through school, mass awareness campaigns, mass media and social media is of utmost importance to combat plastic pollution. Legislature on extent of plastic use and complete ban on single use plastic products along with enough awareness to enforce such laws may go a long way in combating the menace.
References
Sjøberg L, Moen BE, Rundmo T (2004) Explaining risk perception. An evaluation of the psychometric paradigm in risk perception research. Rotunde publikasjoner, Rotunde no. 84
Syberg K, Hansen SF (2016) Environmental risk assessment of chemicals and nanomaterials — the best foundation for regulatory decision-making? Sci Total Environ 541:784–794
Beck U (1986) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:467–471
Aminrad Z, Zakariya SZ, Hadi AS, Sakari M. Relationship between awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards environmental education among secondary school students in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;22(9):1326-33.
Banerjee AN, Banik N, Dalmia A. Demand for household sanitation in India using NFHS-3 data. Empirical Economics. 2017 Aug;53(1):307-27.
Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F. Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. The international journal of life cycle assessment. 2003 Mar;8(2):92-8.
Wichai-utcha N, Chavalparit O. 3Rs Policy and plastic waste management in Thailand. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management. 2019 Jan 22;21(1):10-22.9$ .
Syberg K, Hansen SF, Christensen TB, Khan FR. Risk perception of plastic pollution: Importance of stakeholder involvement and citizen science. InFreshwater microplastics 2018 (pp. 203-221). Springer, Cham.(1)
Kenyon KW, Kridler E (1969) Laysan albatross swallow indigestible matter. Auk 86:339–343
Chenxi W, Kai Z, Xiong X (2017) Microplastic pollution in inland waters focusing on Asia. In:
Wagner M, Lambert S (eds) Freshwater microplastics: emerging environmental contaminants?
Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61615-5_5 (in this volume)
Khan FR, Mayoma BS, Biginagwa FJ, Syberg K (2017) Microplastics in inland African
waters: presence, sources and fate. In: Wagner M, Lambert S (eds) Freshwater microplastics:
emerging environmental contaminants? Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61615-
_6 (in this volume)
Dris R, Gasperi J, Tassin B (2017) Sources and fate of microplastics in urban areas: a focus on
Paris megacity. In: Wagner M, Lambert S (eds) Freshwater microplastics: emerging environmental contaminants? Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61615-5_4 in this volume’
Carpenter EJ, Smith KL Jr (1972) Plastic on the Sargasso Sea surface. Science 175:1240–1241
Ryan P (2015) A brief history of marine litter research. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M
(eds) Marine anthropogenic litter. Springer International Publishing, Berlin
Van Franeker JA (1985) Plastic ingestion in the North Atlantic fulmar. Mar Pollut Bull
:367–369
Ryan P (1987) The incidence and characteristics of plastic particles ingested by seabirds. Mar
Environ Res 23:175–206
Harper PC, Fowler JA (1987) Plastic pellets in New Zealand storm-killed prions (Pachyptila spp.), 1958–1977. Notornis 34:65–70
IMO (2016) Annex V: prevention of pollution by Garbage from Ships. International Maritime Organisation, United Nations. Available at: http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/environment/pollutionprevention/garbage/Pages/Default.aspx
Brennholt N, Heß M, Reifferscheid G (2017) Freshwater microplastics: challenges for regulationand management. In: Wagner M, Lambert S (eds) Freshwater microplastics: emergingenvironmental contaminants? Springer, Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61615-5_12 (in this volume)
Moore CJ, Moore SL, Leecaster MK, Weisberg SB (2001) A comparison of plastic and
plankton in the North Pacific central gyre. Mar Pollut Bull 42:1297–1300
Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AWG, McGonigle D,
Russell AE (2004) Science 304:838
Reuters (2015) Plastic pollution devastating the world’s oceans. Reuters International, May13, 2015. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/video/2015/05/13/plastic-pollution-devastating-the-worlds?videoId¼364209898&videoChannel¼6&channelName¼Technology
REMA (2012) Rwanda against plastic bags. Rwanda Environment Management Authority(REMA) Available at: http://www.rema.gov.rw/index.php?id¼10&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%
D¼36&cHash¼6fee2e51447d80ce6ce1d7d778969aea
Khan FR, Mayoma B, Biginagwa FJ, Syberg K Microplastics in inland African waters:
presence, sources and fate. In: Warger M, Lambert S (eds) Freshwater microplastics -
emerging environmental contaminants? Springer Nature. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61615-5_6
(in this volume)
Zhao B, Rehati P, Yang Z, Cai Z, Guo C, Li Y. The potential toxicity of microplastics on human health. Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:168946. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168946. Epub 2023 Dec 2. PMID: 38043812.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sagnik Chakraborty, Noor Islam Bag, Bobby Paul
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.