Immediate Effects of Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Protocol on OromotorSkills and Neurobehavioral State Regulation of Preterm Infants

Authors

  • Krishna Pithadia Krishna Pithadia (Neurosciences),SunandanDivetia School of Science,NMIMS(deemed-to-be) University),Room 755,7thFloor,MithibaiBuilding,VL Mehta Road,VileparleWest,Mumbai 400056,India
  • Sabah Thaver Assistant Professor, SDSOS, NMIMS (deemed-to-be) University, Room 755, 7th Floor, Mithibai Building, VL Mehta Road, Vile Parle West, Mumbai 400056,India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/tdndra12

Keywords:

early intervention, preterm infant, nicu, oromotor intervention, PIOMI, non-nutritive suck, neuro behavioural state regulation

Abstract

Background: Preterm infants are vulnerable population who are at highest risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome which leads them to be dependent on ventilator support for survival. They use accessory muscle for breathing leading them to affect their oral musculature more. They are the “high risk” group as they are struggling to fulfil their basic survival need of oral feed as the suck-swallow breath co-ordination is affected in them. Prolong use of nasogastric and orogastric tube for their optimum nutrition is not advisable therefore it is important to transit to oral feed as soon as they become vitally stable.

Infants who have undergone endotracheal intubation, continuous CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) support, nasal or oral suctioning develops aversion for oral feeding due to continuous negative feedback. The preterm infant has poor oral motor control related to weaker muscle tone around the mouth, less sensitivity, less tongue strength compared to the full-term infant.

Method: Total 30 preterm infant of mean age 34.67(±2.76) weeks participated in study. Subjects were screened as per inclusion and exclusion criteria. Baseline data and outcome measure was done using non-nutritive suck score and Anderson behavioural state scale(ABSS).6 sessions were given in 3 day again they were assessed with Non nutritive suck scale, ABSS.

Conclusion: There were statistically and clinically significant changes observed in all of the outcome measures; there were significant difference seen in quantity of feed taken and weight gain of preterm infant. There were significant improvement in strength of suck and rhythm and co-ordination of oral structure during non nutritive suck.

.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

.Hadiseh G, Brenda L. The effect of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomised control trial. International journal of paediatric otorhinolaryngology.(2019);120(2019) 202-209.

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth

William W.Nutritional Support Strategies for the Preterm Infant in The Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, PediatricGastroenterolHepatol Nutr.2018;October 21(4):234-247.

Czech-Kowalski J,.Mineral and nutritional requirements of preterm infant, Seminars in Foetal and Neonatal Medicine.2020;Feb;25(1):101071.10.1016/j.siny.2019.101071.

Bettina B., Oral versus Nasal Route for Placing Feeding Tubes: No Effect on Hypoxemia and Bradycardia in Infants with Apnea of Prematurity Neonatology.2010; 98:143–149 DOI: 10.1159/000279617.

Melinda C.,Oral Development and Pathology,Ochsner J.2018 Winter;18(4):339-344. 10.31486/toj.18.0040.

Chantal L., (2016) development of Infants Oral Feeding skill: What Do We Know? Am J ClinNutr, 2016 Feb;103(2):616S-21S.doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.109603.

Erin M., Jordan R., Task Specificity in Early Oromotor development Semin Speech Lang. 2009;29(4): 257–266. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1103389.

Shailaja J., JayantiK., Comparative study on the effect of oral motor intervention protocols on oral motor skills of preterm infants from tertiary care hospital in metropolitan city: pilot study, International Journal of Contemporary Paediatrics, 2020 Jul;7(7):1506-1512,doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20202606.

Barry L., Robin J., Infants Neurobehavioral development, Semi Perinatal, 2011 February; 35(1): 8–19. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.10.003

Brenda L.,Effect of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention on Feeding Progression and Length of Stay in Preterm Infants, Advances in NeonatalCare. 2011 Apr;11(2):129-39.doi:10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182115a2a.

SR Jadcherla, M Wang, Impact of prematurity and co-morbidities on feeding milestones in neonates: a retrospective study, Journal of Perinatology.2010;30, 201–208.doi:10.1038/jp.2009.149

Tian-Chan L., (2014) The effect of an early oral stimulation program on oral feeding of preterm infants, international journal of nursing science,2014;42-47.doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2014.02.010.

Amy D.,Joan A., Development of Swallowing and Feeding: Prenatal Through First Year of Life, Developmental Disability Research Review,2008;14:105-117.doi:10.1002/ddrr.16

Adrienne T., Brain development and Role of Experience in Early Years, Zero Three. Author manuscript.2009;November 1; 30(2): 9–13.

De master D. Bick J.,Nurturing the preterm infant brain: leveraging Neuroplasticity to improve neurobehavioral outcomes, International Paediatric Research Foundation.2019 ;Jan;85(2):166-175.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-018-0203-9.

Mario M.,Physiology of nutritive sucking in newborns and infants,Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex 2011;68(4):296-303.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-24

How to Cite

Immediate Effects of Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Protocol on OromotorSkills and Neurobehavioral State Regulation of Preterm Infants. (2024). Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal, 18(3), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.37506/tdndra12