A Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Contextual Factors for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education

Main Article Content

Madhuri Meshram
Sathish Rajamani

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming more common in healthcare and health professions education, but
it is still not consistently used in nursing programs because of a number of contextual factors. To help with effective
implementation and curriculum development, it’s important to know what makes it easier or harder for nursing schools
to use AI.
Methods: A scoping review was performed utilising the Peters et al. framework to delineate the current evidence
regarding AI integration in nursing and allied health professions education. A systematic search of Google Scholar,
PubMed, and Semantic Scholar yielded 1,245 records; subsequent screening and full-text evaluation resulted in 42 studies
that satisfied the inclusion criteria. Data from empirical studies, case reports, policy papers, and discussion articles were
extracted and thematically synthesised to identify principal barriers, facilitators, and contextual influences.
Results: Major problems included a lack of technological infrastructure, problems with interoperability, and a lack of
technical support. There were also gaps in knowledge and skills among teachers and students. Concerns about ethics and
privacy, a reluctance to change, a lack of resources, and unclear policies and regulations made it even harder for AI to
be adopted. Facilitators included active participation from stakeholders, thorough training focused on AI, a supportive
infrastructure, clear policy frameworks, proven benefits for learning and clinical decision-making, and collaboration
between different fields. Regional, cultural, and contextual disparities significantly impacted the degree and character of AI
integration, with affluent environments typically more equipped to adopt AI-enhanced education.
Conclusion: The integration of AI into nursing education is influenced by a complex interplay of technological, educational,
ethical, policy, and contextual factors. To make AI adoption in nursing curricula more meaningful, it is important to deal
with known barriers and strengthen facilitators using strategies that are sensitive to the context and have many different
parts. The review provides a foundation for creating standardised AI curricula, funding infrastructure, and guiding future
implementation research and policy in nursing education.

Article Details

Section

Review Article

Author Biographies

Madhuri Meshram, Associate Professor – School of Nursing – DRIEMS University, Cuttack. Odisha

Associate Professor – School of Nursing – DRIEMS University, Cuttack. Odisha

Sathish Rajamani, Professor – School of Nursing – DRIEMS University, Cuttack. Odisha

Professor – School of Nursing – DRIEMS University, Cuttack. Odisha

How to Cite

A Review of Barriers, Facilitators, and Contextual Factors for the Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education. (2026). International Journal of Nursing Education, 18(2), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.37506/znkc1j02

References

1. Balay-odao EM, Omirzakova D, Bolla SR, Almazan

JU, Cruz JP. Health professions students’ perceptions

of artificial intelligence and its integration to

health professions education and healthcare: a

thematic analysis. AI & Soc [Internet]. 2025 Mar 1

[cited 2025 Dec 10];40(3):1863–73. Available from:

https://link-springer-com.kiitlibrary.remotexs.in/

article/10.1007/s00146-024-01957-5

2. Hatem NAH, Ibrahim MIM, Yousuf SA. Assessing

Yemeni university students’ public perceptions

toward the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare.

Sci Rep [Internet]. 2024 Dec 1 [cited 2025 Dec

10];14(1):28299. Available from: https://link-springercom.

kiitlibrary.remotexs.in/article/10.1038/s41598-

024-80203-w

3. Yu KH, Beam AL, Kohane IS. Artificial intelligence in

healthcare. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):719–31.

4. Artificial intelligence in health care: within touching

distance - The Lancet [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec 10].

Available from: https://www.thelancet.com/

journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31540-4/

fulltext.

5. Beam AL, Kohane IS. Translating Artificial Intelligence

Into Clinical Care. JAMA [Internet]. 2016 Dec 13 [cited

2025 Dec 10];316(22):2368–9. Available from: https://

doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17217

6. Tan J, Qin F, Yuan J. Current applications of artificial

intelligence combined with urine detection in disease

diagnosis and treatment. Transl Androl Urol [Internet].

2021 Apr [cited 2025 Dec 10];10(4):1769–79. Available

from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/

PMC8100834/

7. Chen J, Remulla D, Nguyen JH, Dua A, Liu Y, Dasgupta

P, et al. Current status of artificial intelligence

applications in urology and their potential to influence

clinical practice. BJU Int. 2019 Oct;124(4):567–77.

8. Goldenberg SL, Nir G, Salcudean SE. A new era:

artificial intelligence and machine learning in prostate

cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2019 July;16(7):391–403.

9. Hamamoto R, Komatsu M, Takasawa K, Asada

K, Kaneko S. Epigenetics Analysis and Integrated

Analysis of Multiomics Data, Including Epigenetic

Data, Using Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Precision

Medicine. Biomolecules. 2019 Dec 30;10(1):62.

10. Kiran M, Xie Y, Anjum N, Ball G, Pierscionek B,

Russell D. Machine learning and artificial intelligence

in type 2 diabetes prediction: a comprehensive

33-year bibliometric and literature analysis. Front

Digit Health. 2025;7:1557467.

11. Yang Q, Bee YM, Lim CC, Sabanayagam C, Yim-Lui

Cheung C, Wong TY, et al. Use of artificial intelligence

with retinal imaging in screening for diabetesassociated

complications: systematic review.

EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Mar;81:103089.

12. Yang Z, Tian D, Zhao X, Zhang L, Xu Y, Lu X, et

al. Evolutionary patterns and research frontiers

of artificial intelligence in age-related macular

degeneration: a bibliometric analysis. Quant Imaging

Med Surg. 2025 Jan 2;15(1):813–30.

13. Usman TM, Saheed YK, Nsang A, Ajibesin A, Rakshit

S. A systematic literature review of machine learning

based risk prediction models for diabetic retinopathy

progression. Artif Intell Med. 2023 Sept;143:102617.

14. Yismaw MB, Tafere C, Tefera BB, Demsie DG, Feyisa

K, Addisu ZD, et al. Artificial intelligence based

predictive tools for identifying type 2 diabetes patients

at high risk of treatment Non-adherence: A systematic

review. Int J Med Inform. 2025 June;198:105858.

15. Cangelosi G, Conti A, Caggianelli G, Panella M, Petrelli

F, Mancin S, et al. Barriers and Facilitators to Artificial

Intelligence Implementation in Diabetes Management

from Healthcare Workers’ Perspective: A Scoping

Review. Medicina (Kaunas) [Internet]. 2025 Aug 1

[cited 2025 Dec 10];61(8):1403. Available from:https://

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12387811/

16. Alzghaibi H. Adoption barriers and facilitators of

wearable health devices with AI integration: a patientcentred

perspective. Front Med [Internet]. 2025 Apr 3

[cited 2025 Dec 10];12. Available from: https://www.

frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/

fmed.2025.1557054/full

17. Scipion CEA, Manchester MA, Federman A, Wang

Y, Arias JJ. Barriers to and facilitators of clinician

acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in

healthcare settings: a scoping review. 2025 Apr 1

[cited 2025 Dec 10]; Available from: https://bmjopen.

bmj.com/content/15/4/e092624

18. Chen Z, Liu X, Hogan W, Shenkman E, Bian J.

Applications of artificial intelligence in drug

development using real-world data. Drug Discov

Today. 2021 May;26(5):1256–64.

19. Nam JG, Hwang EJ, Kim J, Park N, Lee EH, Kim

HJ, et al. AI Improves Nodule Detection on Chest

Radiographs in a Health Screening Population:

A Randomized Controlled Trial. Radiology. 2023

Apr;307(2):e221894.

20. Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection

system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy

(CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study -

ScienceDirect [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec 11]. Available

from:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/

article/abs/pii/S246812531930411X

21. Performance of a Deep Learning Algorithm

Compared with Radiologic Interpretation for Lung

Cancer Detection on Chest Radiographs in a Health

Screening PopulationRadiology [Internet]. [cited

2025 Dec 11]. Available from: https://pubs.rsna.

org/doi/abs/10.1148/radiol.2020201240?utm_

source=rsna&getft_integrator=rsna

22. Masud R, Al-Rei M, Lokker C. Computer-Aided

Detection for Breast Cancer Screening in Clinical

Settings: Scoping Review. JMIR Medical Informatics

[Internet]. 2019 July 18 [cited 2025 Dec 11];7(3):e12660.

Available from: https://medinform.jmir.org/2019/3/e12660

23. Houssami N, Kirkpatrick-Jones G, Noguchi N, Lee CI.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) for the early detection of

breast cancer: a scoping review to assess AI’s potential

in breast screening practice. Expert Rev Med Devices.

2019 May;16(5):351–62.

24. Khairat S, Marc D, Crosby W, Al Sanousi A. Reasons

For Physicians Not Adopting Clinical Decision

Support Systems: Critical Analysis. JMIR Med Inform.

2018 Apr 18;6(2):e24.

25. Segal MM, Rahm AK, Hulse NC, Wood G, Williams

JL, Feldman L, et al. Experience with Integrating

Diagnostic Decision Support Software with Electronic

Health Records: Benefits versus Risks of Information

Sharing. EGEMS (Wash DC) [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec

11];5(1):23. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.

gov/articles/PMC5994959/

26. Barriers and facilitators to the adoption of artificial

intelligence in radiation oncology: A New Zealand

study - Technical Innovations and Patient Support

in Radiation Oncology [Internet]. [cited 2025 Dec 11].

Available from: https://www.tipsro.science/article/

S2405-6324(21)00018-4/fulltext

27. Strohm L, Hehakaya C, Ranschaert ER, Boon WPC,

Moors EHM. Implementation of artificial intelligence

(AI) applications in radiology: hindering and

facilitating factors. Eur Radiol [Internet]. 2020 Oct 1

[cited 2025 Dec 11];30(10):5525–32. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06946-y

28. Morrison K. Artificial intelligence and the NHS: a

qualitative exploration of the factors influencing

adoption. Future Healthc J. 2021 Nov;8(3):e648–54.

29. Jr TW, Xing F, Barón AE, Feser WJ, Hirsch E, Miller

YE, et al. Quantifying the incremental value of deep

learning: Application to lung nodule detection.

PLOS ONE [Internet]. 2020 Apr 14 [cited 2025 Dec

11];15(4):e0231468. Available from: https://journals.

plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.

pone.0231468

30. Capobianco E. High-dimensional role of AI and

machine learning in cancer research. Br J Cancer. 2022

Mar;126(4):523–32.

31. Davenport T, Kalakota R. The potential for artificial

intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthc J. 2019

June;6(2):94–8.

32. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [Internet]. [cited

2025 Dec 11]. Available from: https://jbi-global-wiki.

refined.site/space/jbi-global-wiki.refined.site