Comparison of Obliques Muscles Strength Between Left and Right Side in Normal Young Adults Using Handheld Dynamometer - A Pilot Study

Authors

  • Bharati Asgaonkar
  • Nikita Singh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/26jchz21

Keywords:

Oblique Muscle Strength, Handheld Dynamometer, Oblique Muscle Strength Asymmetry.

Abstract

Background: Asymmetry of abdominal muscles is a potential cause for lowback pain. Most studies assume the
rotational strength towards non dominant side to be more but no studies have been conducted to objectively
measure the asymmetry. In subjects with spinal deformity like scoliosis which has a rotational component to it,
it can be presumed that there could be asymmetry between the oblique force couplehowever this study aims to
find out whether this asymmetry exists in normal healthy individuals. By using manual muscle testing for assessing
oblique muscle strength only gross asymmetry can be detected. Therefore there is a need for more objective
measure to detect subtle discrepancies within strength of both sides.
Objective: The objective of this study is to measure the strength of external and internal oblique on both side
using handheld dynamometer and to compare the strength on both sides.
Methodology:30 healthy young individuals in the age group of 18-30 years were selected to participate in the
study. All subjects were right hand dominant.External oblique and internal oblique muscle strength was measured
in KGs using a Jamar type of hydraulichand held dynamometer.
Results: There was a significant difference between the strength of external obliques on right and left side with
strength on right side being more whereas there was no significant difference between strength of internal
oblique between right and left side.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Bharati Asgaonkar

    Bharati Asgaonkar, Associate Professor, Physiotherapy School and Centre, TNMC & BYL Nair
    Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

  • Nikita Singh

    Postgraduate Student (Musculoskeletal Physiotherapy )
    Physiotherapy School and Centre, TNMC & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

References

Oliva-Lozano JM, Muyor JM. Core muscle activity duringphysical fitness exercises: A systematic review. Inter-national journal of environmental research and publichealth. 2020 Jan;17(12):4306.

Florence PK, Elizabeth KM, Patricia GP, Mary MR, Wil-liam AR. Muscles Testing And Function With PostureAnd Pain. Fifth Edition.

MacDonald D, Moseley LG, Hodges PW. Why do somepatients keep hurting their back? Evidence of ongoingback muscle dysfunction during remission from recur-rent backpain. Pain. 2009; 142(3):183–8.

Hides J, Stanton W, Dilani Mendis M, Sexton M. The Rela-tionship Of Transversus Abdominis And Lumbar Multif-idus Clinical Muscle Tests In Patients With Chronic LowBack Pain. Manual Therapy. 2011; 16(6):573–7.

Ota M, Kaneoka K. Differences In Abdominal MuscleThicknesses Between Chronic Low Back Pain PatientsAnd Healthy Subjects. Journal Of Physical Therapy Sci-ence. 2011; 23(6):855–8.

Sidhu J. Why does back pain recur? New research find-ings and treatment considerations. Dynamic Chiroprac-tic. 2011;29(6)

Critchley DJ, Coutts FJ. Abdominal Muscle Function InChronic Low Back Pain Patients. Physiotherapy. 2002 88(6):322–32.

Ota M, Kaneoka K. Differences In Abdominal MuscleThicknesses Between Chronic Low Back Pain PatientsAnd Healthy Subjects. Journal Of Physical Therapy Sci-ence. 2011; 23(6):855–8.

Roddy TS, BrizzolaraKJ,.Cook KF. Side To Side Differenc-es In Transverse Abdominus Muscle (Tra) MeasuredBy Real Time Ultrasound In Persons With And Without Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP). Orthopaedic PhysicalTherapy. 2007; 20(2):56-9.

Kim DK, Kim CY, Lee BK, Seo D. A comparison of ultra-sonography measurement on the abdominal musclethickness between adolescent idiopathic scoliosis andhealthy subjects. Journal of back and musculoskeletalrehabilitation. 2018 Jan 1;31(1):65-74.4

Sung PS, Spratt KF, Wilder DG. A possible methodolog-ical flaw in comparing dominant and nondominant sided lumbar spine muscle responses without simulta-neously considering hand dominance. Spine. 2004 Sep1;29(17):1914-22.

Rankin G Stokes M, Newham DJ. Abdominal Muscle SizeAnd Symmetry In Normal Subjects. Muscle And Nerve:Official Journal Of The American Association Of Electro-diagnostic Medicine. 2006 Sep;(3):320-6.

Park SH, Song MY, Park HJ, Park JH, Bae HY, Lim DS.Effects Of Different Types Of Contraction In Abdomi-nal Bracing On The Asymmetry Of Left And Right Ab-dominal Muscles. Journal Of Physical Therapy Science. 2014;26(12):1843-5.

Strutton PH, Beith ID, Theodorou S, Catley M, Mcgre-gor AH, Davey NJ. Corticospinal Activation Of InternalOblique Muscle Has A Strong Ipsilateral ComponentAnd Can Be Lateralised In Man. Experimental Brain Re-search. 2004 Oct 1;158(4):474-9.j

Hides J, Stanton W, Freke M, Wilson S, McMahon S, Rich-ardson C. MRI study of the size, symmetry and functionof the trunk muscles among elite cricketers with andwithout low back pain. British journal of sports medi-cine. 2008 Oct 1;42(10):809-13.

Linek P, Noormohammadpour P, Mansournia Ma, Wol-ny T, Sikora D. Morphological Changes Of The LateralAbdominal Muscles In Adolescent Soccer Players WithLow Back Pain: A Prospective Cohort Study. Journal OfSport And Health Science. 2018 Mar.

Butler HL, Hubley-Kozey CL, Kozey JW. Activation am-plitude patterns do not change for back muscles butare altered for abdominal muscles between dominantand non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts. Eu-ropean journal of applied physiology. 2009 May;106(1):95-104.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-09

How to Cite

Comparison of Obliques Muscles Strength Between Left and Right Side in Normal Young Adults Using Handheld Dynamometer - A Pilot Study. (2024). Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal, 18(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.37506/26jchz21