Psychosocial Treatment Techniques to Augment the Impact of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain among School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/e9g3f219Keywords:
Chronic Low back pain, psychosocial treatment, school teachers, integrative approachAbstract
Background: School teachers perform numerous tasks that contribute to low back pain and affect their activities of daily living, social and vocational abilities. Low back pain is multidimensional in nature constituting physical, psychological and social components. Psychosocial variables pose as an obstacle to rehabilitative recovery and have a role in development of chronicity, these factors are often neglected in the rehabilitation process, the present study integrates psychosocial factors with musculoskeletal factors and utilizes a rehabilitation program that focuses on overall recovery.
Objectives: This study aims to find effective treatment for psychosocial variables and examines the physical and psychosocial changes that occur in school teachers suffering with CLBP when they receive occupational therapy augmented with psychosocial intervention. The intervention targets anxiety, perceived stress, and self-efficacy.
Methodology: The study sample consisted of 60 school teachers, half of the sample was enrolled for occupational therapy intervention and other half for occupational therapy intervention augmented with psychosocial treatment techniques.
Results: At post-treatment participants in the occupational therapy augmented with psychosocial treatment group showed significant difference in measures of anxiety, perceived stress and self-efficacy, pain intensity, pain severity, pain disability and 5-minute walk test distance compared to participants who received occupational therapy treatment only. The two groups did not differ significantly in finger-to-floor test.
Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that augmenting psychosocial variables is beneficial to person-environment factors of disability and result in better rehabilitation outcomes in terms of both psychosocial variables as well as pain related variables.
Downloads
References
GBD 2021 Low Back Pain Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of low back pain, 1990–2020, its attributable risk factors, and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Rheumatology. 22 May 2023.
Lee H, et al. How does pain lead to disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies in people with back and neck pain. Pain 2015; 156: 988–97
Lotters F, etal. The prognostic value of depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, and self-efficacy for duration of lost-time benefits in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63:794–801.
Hoogendoorn WE, etal. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Aug 15.
Marras WS. Occupational low back disorder causation and control. Ergonomics. 2000 Jul;43(7):880-902.
Mark A., et al. Preventing Progression to Chronicity in First Onset, Subacute Low Back Pain: An Exploratory Study, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 90, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 545-552.
Gupta G, Sharma A. Prevalence of Low Back Pain among Higher Secondary School Teachers of Kanpur, India. J OrthopPhysiother 2018.
Korkmaz NC, et al. Musculoskeletal pain, associated risk factors and coping strategies in school teachers. Sci Res Essays. 2001;6(3):649–57.
Eatough EM, et al. Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(3):554–63.
Chawla NS. Unveiling the ABCs: Identifying India's Healthcare Service Gaps. Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7)
Gentry, K., et al. The Biopsychosocial Model: Application to Occupational Therapy Practice. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy 2018, 6(4).
Wolfgang Maier, et al. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders, Journal of Affective Disorders 1988, Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 61-68
Simmonds MJ. Measuring and managing pain and performance. Man Ther. 2006 Aug;11(3):175-9.
Pollard CA. Preliminary validity study of the Pain Disability Index. Percept Motor Skill 1984; 59:974.
Tait RC, et al. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40: 171–82.
J. Trudeau et al., Validation of the revised short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2) for self-report of pain qualities in patients with acute low back pain, The Journal of Pain, Volume 13, Issue 4, Supplement, April 2012, Pages S4
Eun-Hyun Lee, Review of the Psychometric Evidence of the Perceived Stress Scale, Asian Nursing Research, Volume 6, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 121-127.
Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. Generalized Self-Efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston, Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs 1995, pp. 35-37
Crofford LJ. Psychological aspects of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res ClinRheumatol. 2015 Feb;29(1):147-55
Turk D, et.al. Pain and behavioral medicine: a cognitive–behavioral perspective. New York: Guilford; 1983.
Shariat A, et.al. The impact of modified exercise and relaxation therapy on chronic lower back pain in office workers: a randomized clinical trial. J ExercRehabil. 2019 Oct 28;15(5):703-708.
Traeger AC, et.al. Effect of primary care based education on reassurance in patients with acute low back pain systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):733-743.
Coppack RJ, et.al. Use of a goal setting intervention to increase adherence to low back pain rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2012. 26:1032–1042.
Pergolizzi JV Jr, LeQuang JA. Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review for Managing Pain and Improving Function in Acute and Chronic Conditions. Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):83-96.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Latika Pandey, Rashida Begum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.