Effectiveness of End Range Mobilization and Reverse Distraction Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Comparative Study

Authors

  • J. Elisha Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University - SDM College of Physiotherapy
  • Rajeev Kumar Lal Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, SDM College of Physiotherapy.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/vfhhdp41

Keywords:

Adhesive capsulitis,End range mobilization, Reverse Distraction Technique.

Abstract

Background: Adhesive capsulitis is a very common musculoskeletal disorder with spontaneous onset characterized by pain and restricted active and passive range of motion. The common mobilization technique used in treating adhesive capsulitis is end range mobilization and there is only one study which explored individual effect of reverse distraction technique. But no studies have compared these two techniques and its effects in subjects with adhesive capsulitis.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of end range mobilization and reverse distraction techniques in treating adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder).


Methods: A total of 60 subjects diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (n=30), receiving end range mobilization with conventional therapy and Group B (n=30), treated with reverse distraction technique with conventional therapy. Pre and post-intervention assessments included passive range of motion in shoulder flexion, abduction, internal rotation and external rotation and The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score at baseline and end of 4 weeks.


Results: Significant improvements were observed in both groups post-intervention. Group B demonstrated higher passive range of motion and gains and improved function in shoulder.


Conclusion: Both techniques are effective in managing adhesive capsulitis, but reverse distraction technique may offer better results for improving shoulder mobility and function.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • J. Elisha, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University - SDM College of Physiotherapy

    Assistant Professor , Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheswara University - SDM College of Physiotherapy.

  • Rajeev Kumar Lal, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, SDM College of Physiotherapy.

    Professor Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, SDM College of Physiotherapy.

References

Abrassart S, Kolo F, Piotton S, Chih-Hao Chiu J, Stirling P, Hoffmeyer P, Lädermann A. ‘Frozen shoulder’is ill-defined. How can it be described better?. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020 May;5(5):273-9.

Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, Rodriguez EK. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder & elbow. 2017 Apr;9(2):75-84.

Bulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, et al.: Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis, 1984, 43: 353–360. [Medline].

Cyriax J. Textbook of Orthopedic Medicine, Vol 1: Diagnosis of Soft Tissue Lesions. 7th ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co; 1978.

Lin JJ, Lim HK, Yang JL. Effect of shoulder tightness on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics, and scapulohumeral rhythm in subjects with stiff shoulders. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2006 May;24(5):1044-51.

Bertoft ES. Painful shoulder disorders from a physiotherapeutic view: a review of literature. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 1999;11 :229– 277.

Arslan S, Çeliker R. Comparison of the efficacy of local corticosteroid injection and physical therapy for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. RheumatolInt 2001;21 :20– 23.

Vermeulen HM, Obermann WR, Burger BJ, Kok GJ, Rozing PM, van den Ende CH. End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a multiple-subject case report. Physical Therapy. 2000 Dec 1;80(12):1204-13.

Lin HT, Hsu AT, An KN, Chien JR, Kuan TS, Chang GL. Reliability of stiffness measured in glenohumeral joint and its application to assess the effect of end-range mobilization in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Manual therapy. 2008 Aug 1;13(4):307-16.

Yu IY, Jung IG, Kang MH, Lee DK, Oh JS. Immediate effects of an end-range mobilization technique on shoulder range of motion and skin temperature in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(6):1723-5.

Agarwal S, Raza S, Moiz JA, Anwer S, Alghadir AH. Effects of two different mobilization techniques on pain, range of motion and functional disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a comparative study. Journal of physical therapy science. 2016;28(12):3342-9.

Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a technical report. International journal of sports physical therapy. 2012 Jun;7(3):306.

Breckenridge JD, McAuley JH. Shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI). Journal of physiotherapy. 2011 Jan 1;57(3):197.

Shaffer B, Tibone JE, Kerlan RK. Frozen shoulder. A long-term follow-up. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. 1992 Jun;74(5):738-46.

Do Moon G, Lim JY, Da YK, Kim TH. Comparison of Maitland and Kaltenborn mobilization techniques for improving shoulder pain and range of motion in frozen shoulders. Journal of physical therapy science. 2015;27(5):1391-5.

Codman EA. The Shoulder: Rupture of the Supraspinatus Tendon and Other Lesions in or About the Subacromial Bursa. Boston, MA: T Todd Company; 1934.

Biradi M, Diwanmal S, Lal R, Kulkarni R, Rakaraddi S. Effects of anterior versus posterior end range mobilizations on shoulder pain in subjects with adhesive capsulitis stage II-A comparative study. Medica. 2017 Jul;6(2):36.

Mangus BC, Hoffman LA, Hoffman MA, Altenburger P. Basic principles of extremity joint mobilization using a Kaltenborn approach. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 2002;11 :235– 250.

Lundberg A, Malmgren K, Schomburg ED: Role of joint afferents in motor control exemplified by effects on reflex pathways from Ib afferents. J Physiol, 1978, 284: 327–343.

Surenkok O, Aytar A, Baltaci G: Acute effects of scapular mobilization in shoulder dysfunction: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Sport Rehabil, 2009, 18: 493–501.

Yang JL, Chang CW, Chen SY, Wang SF, Lin JJ. Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial. Physical therapy. 2007 Oct 1;87(10):1307-15.

Frank C, Akeson WH, Amiel D, Coutts RD. Physiology and therapeutic value of passive joint motion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®. 1984 May 1;185:113-25.

Cunningham JB, McCrum-Gardner E. Power, effect and sample size using GPower: practical issues for researchers and members of research ethics committees. Evidence-Based Midwifery. 2007 Dec 15;5(4):132-7.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

Effectiveness of End Range Mobilization and Reverse Distraction Technique in Adhesive Capsulitis: A Comparative Study. (2025). Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal, 19(2), 15-23. https://doi.org/10.37506/vfhhdp41