EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION (IASTM) VERSUS MAITLAND MOBILIZATION ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION, AND FUNCTIONALITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN- A QUICK REVIEW ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Authors

  • Ko Ai Sii  School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.
  • Kamsmalina Binti Mohd School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/120vk854

Keywords:

Neck pain, IASTM, Maitland, ROM, Physiotherapy.

Abstract

Background: Nonspecific neck pain is the most common symptom resulting from postural and mechanical origin.

Objective: This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and Maitland Mobilization in reducing pain, improving range of motion (ROM), and enhancing functionality in individuals with Non-Specific Neck Pain (NSNP) through various literature reviews. Secondary objectives are to examining the short-term effects of both interventions on patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted with 100 participants of University students aged 18-25, diagnosed with NSNP. Participants are randomly assigned to either the IASTM group or the Maitland Mobilization group. The primary outcomes, including pain (Numerical Pain Rating Scale), ROM (Active Cervical ROM), and functionality (Neck Disability Index and Patient-Specific Functional Scale), measured before and after 6 weeks of treatment. Both groups receive their respective treatments once weekly, combined with passive stretching and home exercises.

Results: The study assesses the effects of IASTM and Maitland Mobilization on pain reduction, ROM, and functionality. Data are collected at baseline and after six weeks of intervention, and statistical analysis are performed to compare the outcomes and determine the effectiveness of each treatment method.

Conclusion: The conclusion drawn based on the collected data. The findings provide insights into the comparative effectiveness of IASTM and Maitland Mobilization in treating NSNP, which help inform future clinical decisions and research directions.

Implications: The findings contribute to clinical practice by offering evidence on effective treatment options for NSNP, supporting physiotherapists in optimizing patient care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ko Ai Sii,  School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.

    PG Student, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.

     

  • Kamsmalina Binti Mohd, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.

    Lecturer, School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Allied Health Professions, AIMST University, Kedah 08100, Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-07

How to Cite

EFFECTIVENESS OF INSTRUMENT-ASSISTED SOFT TISSUE MOBILIZATION (IASTM) VERSUS MAITLAND MOBILIZATION ON PAIN, RANGE OF MOTION, AND FUNCTIONALITY AMONG INDIVIDUALS WITH NON-SPECIFIC NECK PAIN- A QUICK REVIEW ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. (2024). Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal, 18(Conf 1), 15. https://doi.org/10.37506/120vk854