To Investigate Nerve Slider and Tensioner Technique in Radiating Pain on lumbar Radiculopathy in Patients with Spinal Stenosis

Authors

  • J.Sheikh Asma Banu Physiotherapist, Bangalore
  • K.Kalaiselvi Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore
  • Mahendran P Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37506/9ndt1e06

Keywords:

Spinal stenosis, slider technique, Tensioner technique, radiating pain.

Abstract

Background: Spinal stenosis impacts often in the lumbar region to the aged population where 20% are above 60 years old. Low back trouble, tingling sensation or numbness are common symptoms with lumbar spinal stenosis which leads to disability and disturbing individual lives.

Method: The study’s intent was to understand which one of two Neurodynamic techniques, that is slider technique and tensioner techniques has better effects on improving symptoms and dysfunctions for cases of radiating pain induced by Lumbar spinal stenosis. 50 subjects between 35 - 60 years and above were signed randomly in 2 groups. The participants in the first group were treated by slider technique and the second group were treated by tensioner technique. Oswestry disability index, Numeric pain rating scale, Straight leg raise ranges of P1 and P2 were recorded to assess pain and disability. Along with neurodynamic technique, participants were administered by a home exercise program. 

Result: The Statistical analysis revealed a significant reduction in pain and disability score in the slider group. Data was analyzed using paired t-test for pre and post comparison. Between groups comparison was done using unpaired t test. On ODI score slider technique was statistically significantly more effective as Pre intervention of 30.560±10.79 decreased significantly to 4.8±5.59 post intervention. The statistical analysis yields a t-value of 20.275 and a p-value of less than 0.001.

Conclusion: slider technique has better clinical results than Tensioner technique improving symptoms and dysfunction. Slider technique also enhances the range of motion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • J.Sheikh Asma Banu, Physiotherapist, Bangalore

    Physiotherapist, Bangalore

  • K.Kalaiselvi, Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore

    Professor, Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore

  • Mahendran P, Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore

    Principal, Acharya Institute of Health Sciences, Bangalore

References

Kruger JR, Secher JT. Prevalence of lumbar spinal

stenosis in general and clinical populations: a

systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J.

Sep;29. doi:10.1007/s00586-020-06339-1.

Chua M, Hochberg U. Gender differences in multifidus

fatty infiltration, sarcopenia, and association with preoperative

pain and functional disability in patients

with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine J. 2022 Jan;22.

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.06.007.

Walter KL, Toole JE. Lumbar spinal stenosis. JAMA.

Jul 19. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.6137.

Kumar M, Garg G. Epidemiology, pathophysiology,

and symptomatic treatment of sciatica: a review.

Elsevier Health Sciences. 2011.

Seo J, Lee JW. Magnetic resonance imaging grading

system of central canal and neural foraminal

stenosis of the lumbar spine with a focus on the Lee

grading system. Korean J Radiol. 2023. doi:10.3348/

kjr.2022.0351.

Hirota K, Hanakita J. Walking-evoked erection in

patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: eight

cases and review of the literature. Asian Spine J. 2021

Apr;15. doi:10.31616/asj.2019.0340.

Murphy DR, Hurwitz EL. Non-surgical approach

to the management of lumbar spinal stenosis:

a prospective observational cohort study. BMC

MusculoskeletDisord. 2006 Feb;7:16. doi:10.1186/1471-

-7-16.

Shacklock M. Clinical neurodynamics: a new system

of neuromusculoskeletal treatment. 1st ed. Elsevier

Health Sciences; 2005.

Ellis R, Carta G, Coppieters MW. Neurodynamics: is

tension contentious? J Man ManipTher. 2022;30(1):3–

doi:10.1080/10669817.2021.2001736.

Camino-Willhuber G. Straight leg raise test [Internet].

ResearchGate; 2019 Apr. Available from:https://

www.researchgate.net/publication/331091665_

Straight_Leg_Raise_Test

Jeawani M, Deo M. Effectiveness of sliders vs

tensioners on pain and disability in non-specific low

back pain with associated lower limb symptoms: pretest

post-test experimental study. Int J Health Sci Res.

doi:10.52403/ijhsr.

Yildiz N, Topuz O. Efficiency of exercise and

ultrasound in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a

prospective randomized controlled trial. ClinRehabil.

Spine J. 2010;24. doi:10.1177/0269215510367539.

Whitman JM, Flynn TW. A comparison between

two physical therapy treatment programs for

patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized

clinical trial. Spine J. 2006 Oct 15;10. doi:10.1097/01.

brs.0000241136.98159.8c.

Sharma SS, Sheth MS. Effect of neurodynamic

mobilization on pain and function with lumbar

radiculopathy. Med Sci. 2018. doi:10.5455/

medscience.2017.06.8664.

Ravilla V, Logesh R. Effects of neural mobilization

on sciatic nerve excursion, symptoms, and regional

function in individuals with nerve-related low back

pain. PhysTher Sport Rehabil. 2022. doi:10.5114/

pq.2021.111835.

Morsi HI, Nahas BE. Effects of slider, tensioner

neurodynamic mobilization techniques, and

stretching exercises in the treatment of chronic

discogenic sciatica: a comparative study. 2022 May 9.

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1572951/v1.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

To Investigate Nerve Slider and Tensioner Technique in Radiating Pain on lumbar Radiculopathy in Patients with Spinal Stenosis. (2025). Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy - An International Journal, 19(2), 26-30. https://doi.org/10.37506/9ndt1e06