A Comparative Study on Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Motor Relearning Programme on Improving Functional Recovery in Stroke Patients.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37506/6n6rgm28Keywords:
PNF, MRP,STROKEAbstract
Background:
Stroke is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, significantly impairing motor function and daily living activities. Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in the recovery process, with various therapeutic approaches aimed at restoring motor function and improving quality of life. Two prominent rehabilitation interventions, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and the Motor Relearning Programme (MRP), have demonstrated effectiveness in improving stroke recovery. However, the comparative efficacy of these approaches remains underexplored.This study aims to compare the effectiveness of PNF and MRP in improving functional recovery in stroke patients. Specifically, the study evaluates the impact of these interventions on motor function, balance, and activities of daily living.
Methods:
A pre-test and post-test experimental design was employed, with 30 stroke patients randomly assigned to either the PNF group (n=15) or the MRP group (n=15). Outcome measures included the Barthel Index for daily activities, the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for motor function, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for functional mobility. The interventions were administered over an 8-week period, with assessments conducted before and after the intervention period.
Results:
Both PNF and MRP led to significant improvements in motor function, balance, and daily activities. However, the MRP group demonstrated greater improvements in motor control and functional mobility, particularly in tasks requiring higher levels of motor coordination. The PNF group showed more significant improvements in balance and range of motion.
Conclusion:
Both PNF and MRP are effective rehabilitation approaches for improving functional recovery in stroke patients. While PNF is beneficial for enhancing balance and flexibility, MRP appears to be more effective in promoting motor control and functional independence. These findings suggest that MRP may be a more comprehensive approach for improving stroke rehabilitation outcomes.
Downloads
References
Levin MF, Weiss PL, Keshner EA. Virtual reality for physical and motor rehabilitation. New York: Springer; 2014. p. 120-135.
Latash ML. Fundamentals of motor control. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012. p. 45-60.
Magill RA, Anderson DI. Motor learning and control: concepts and applications. 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2017. p. 200-215.
Duncan PW, Sullivan JE, Behrman AL. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in the rehabilitation of stroke patients: A review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(8):1060–5.
Carr JH, Shepherd RB. The Motor Relearning Programme for stroke. Br J Occup Ther. 1987;50(7):244–50.
Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Lattanzi D. Task-specific training: Improving functional outcomes in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004;18(1):31–40.
Smania N, Corato E, Fiaschi A. Effects of motor relearning on post-stroke gait: A randomized controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(4):635–40.
Fujii T, Koizumi M. Effectiveness of PNF techniques on balance and functional mobility in stroke patients. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;18(5):316–20.
Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P. Motor learning interventions for improving functional outcomes after stroke: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(7):644–52.
Hesse S, Schubert M. Task-oriented functional training in stroke rehabilitation. Eur J Neurol. 2003;10(5):573–80.
Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–54.
Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Hogan N. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000;8(3):348–58.
Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Task-oriented biofeedback to improve gait in individuals with chronic stroke: Motor learning approach. DisabilRehabil. 2007;29(14):1113–9.
Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, Azen SP. A randomized controlled comparison of motor relearning and task-specific training in chronic stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2004;28(3):176–85.
Krakauer JW. Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;19(1):84–90.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.